Frank Schadt

18 Theses Against Presumed-Consent Legislation
in Organ Removal

01

Patients with the clinical state of irreversible loss of all brain function (brain death) are unquestionably alive

02

Presumed-consent legislation, in particular, rests on denying the life of the severely ill

03

The claim that brain death is the death of the human person is false

04

Defenceless severely ill patients with loss of brain function warrant heightened protection

05

The possibility of organ donation is sufficiently regulated in law in Germany

06

For some organ recipients, acceptance of their new organ depends on the donation being voluntary

07

Presumed-consent legislation is an overreaching instrument for non-consensual organ removal

08

Presumed-consent legislation is incompatible with the idea of organ donation

09

Encroaching upon the organs of fellow human beings is no answer to the illnesses of fellow human beings

10

Because organs are not a common resource, there is no entitlement to organ transplantation

11

The risk of encroachment and the compulsion to declare impair the sense of well-being of fellow citizens

12

The organ-procurement-driven imposition of presumed-consent legislation cannot be justified

13

No one has a right to encroach upon the bodies, lives, and dying of fellow human beings

14

No one has the right to compel an entire population to engage with the issue of organ donation, including to make a decision

15

Rapid, comprehensive information on organ donation and its broad thematic context is not possible

16

An absence of objection can never constitute consent

17

Every organ removal in ‘brain-dead’ severely ill patients causally ends the patient’s vital state

18

Medical interventions fundamentally require the patient’s informed consent
  1. Nationaler Ethikrat (ed.). Die Zahl der Organspenden erhöhen – Zu einem drängenden Problem der Transplantationsmedizin in Deutschland. Berlin, 2007. https://www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/Archiv/Stellungnahme_Organmangel.pdf, 47.

  2. Ibid., 43.

  3. Bundesrat. Gesetzesantrag. Drucksache 278/24 B, July 5, 2024. https://www.bundesrat.de/drs.html?id=278-24(B), 2.

  4. Nationaler Ethikrat (ed.). Die Zahl der Organspenden erhöhen – Zu einem drängenden Problem der Transplantationsmedizin in Deutschland. op. cit., p. 47.

  5. Beckmann, Rainer. “Das unbegründete ‘Hirntod’-Konzept.” JuristenZeitung 78 (2023): 947.